close
close

Strategist: Kamala Harris' ban on price gouging in the grocery trade is put on hold

In this story

Jeff Weniger, Head of Equity Strategy at WisdomTree (AT)spoke with Quartz for the latest episode of our Smart Investing video series.

Watch the interview above and read the transcript below. The transcript of this conversation has been lightly edited for length and clarity.

ANDY MILLS (AM): Kamala Harris reportedly wants to raise the corporate tax rate from 21% to 28%. What impact do you think this will have on the markets?

JEFF LESSER (JW): It used to be 35, and Trump has lowered it to 21, so that's halfway back. First, is that a politically popular move? And second, will it suddenly become much less popular if the S&P reacts to the downside in anticipation of that? Right now, the markets are making new highs or at least hovering around the 5,600 mark. So right now, it looks like that's a non-event for the markets. I say that with a big asterisk because when you think about the top of the S&P 500, that's many of these companies that are basically parking a kind of domicile in Dublin to evade the tax authorities here in the United StatesSo I would say it could pose a risk, especially for technology companies.

AM: Kamala has also proposed a ban on price gouging in the grocery trade. Do you think this will affect the stocks of grocery retailers or large food companies?

Jehovah's Witnesses: Yes, and Mars just announced that it's buying Kellanova, and that was maybe the biggest or second biggest deal of the year, in terms of the entire market. We got a whiff of that news last week. We look at our biggest fund and at the top of our biggest fund, among the top 20 names, you know, Pepsi (PEP)Coca-Cola, Procter & Gamble (PG). And now you have a discussion about price controls for the first time since Nixon. Not wage and price controls like Nixon, but price controls. And I think we're doing this interview, it's in the middle of the DNC, we've got a head-to-head coin toss in front of us. Sometimes you stand there and say things that haven't been properly vetted. You can basically see that I don't think there's an economist on Earth who wants to support that. Austin Gouldsby, for example, came out about a minute later and basically distanced himself from those remarks. So staples, food matters, grocery stores, those kinds of concepts. Let's go into September and see if this is still a Democratic Party political issue. I think it might just kind of get swept away. We'll see.

AM: Is there any usury going on right now?

Jehovah's Witnesses: No. Prices are set on the open market. If you don't like what you get at Walmart (WMT)you can go to Costco (COST) and if you don't like that, even if you think outside, you can go to Dollar Tree (DLTR) or Dollar General (Director General)it's the same with groceries. You can go to a CVS and buy groceries. You can go to a Walgreens. Those are not grocery stores. And look, we own Procter & Gamble, that's just one example. If Procter & Gamble decides to go to extortionate prices on diapers, Kimberly Clark will steal from them. And so it's not in your interest as a megacorporation or as a free society to go back to extortionate prices. Hey, we're trying to win a 50-50 election, so you go on the campaign trail. And sooner or later, my hypothesis is, Harris's advisers will say: stop this extortionate pricing thing.

photo: ANGELA WEISS/AFP (Getty Images)

AM: Voters are particularly concerned about the cost of things because of inflation. And maybe they can identify with that.

Jehovah's Witnesses: Well, then we shouldn't have created so much money. Supply inflation is caused by the money supply, which was rising inexorably. Except for a few things you could call short-term shocks. For example, the complete lack of Russian natural gas to Germany drove inflation up. You could say that maybe that didn't have that big of a monetary impact for them, but generally speaking there was massive fiscal and monetary stimulus during Covid. And that's why we ended up with a CPI of nine. And actually, if you look at the data, it probably should have been a 12 or 13. It was just that the housing data wasn't fully captured by the CPI and now it has to catch up and probably in the next year or three.

In this story