close
close

Janet Jackson's misinformation about Kamala Harris resembled MAGA's lies

Music legend Janet Jackson is rightly facing criticism for misrepresenting Vice President Kamala Harris's ethnicity in an interview with The Guardian. She was asked about her feelings about the possibility of a black woman being elected US president.

We believe that celebrities – especially ones as popular as Jackson – are smart enough to distinguish fact from fiction.

“She's not black,” said the 58-year-old five-time Grammy winner. “That's what I heard. That she's Indian.” Guardian reporter Nosheen Iqbal described herself as “stunned” when Jackson then claimed that Harris' father, who is black, was white. But perhaps Iqbal shouldn't have been shocked. We like to believe that celebrities, especially popular or even idolized ones like Jackson, are smart enough to distinguish fact from fiction.

It wasn't so much that Jackson was misinformed, but that she was repeating the lies fueled by MAGA. Her testimony about what she had heard sounded eerily similar to former President Donald Trump's lie at the National Association of Black Journalists convention in July that the biracial Harris — who says she grew up black, attended the historically black Howard University and is a member of Alpha Kappa Alpha, the oldest black sorority in the country — “accidentally turned black” out of political expediency. And just recently.

Jackson seemed disturbingly unaware that she was spreading misinformation. This is a moment that should make us think about what it means when celebrities express their political views and make policy recommendations when those celebrities typically lead radically different lives than the rest of us.

Jackson, the youngest child in a family of entertainers, cemented her public image as a social justice champion when she lamented the murder of George Floyd in 2020 and became a vocal advocate for Black Lives Matter. She has repeatedly used her social media platforms and live performances to speak out against sexism, racism, homophobia and other forms of discrimination, including xenophobic attacks on immigrants. Even though her advocacy is mostly coupled with heartfelt appeals during acceptance speeches at awards shows and concerts, the soft-spoken icon has left no doubt about what outrages and troubles her. And none of it seems to align with the far political right.

At this point, it's difficult to view any questioning of Harris' race as anything other than an unwarranted personal attack, and it's disappointing that Jackson, who has herself been mistreated, doesn't make that connection.

After the infamous “wardrobe malfunction” during halftime of the 2004 Super Bowl – Justin Timberlake ripped off part of her clothing and exposed her breasts – her songs were taken off the radio and she was disinvited from that year's Grammy Awards. Timberlake faced no consequences and was given a solo show during halftime of the Super Bowl in 2018.

Even as Jackson's career faltered, Jackson's black fans largely stood behind her, rightly seeing her as the victim of a double standard. Perhaps that's why her reluctance to support the black candidate running against Trump – whose racist language and racist policies are well known – is so puzzling. Not only did she question Harris' background, but she also warned that social chaos would ensue regardless of who was elected, without citing any preferences. (It's probably important to note here that Janet Jackson was raised by a mother, Katherine Jackson, who is a devout Jehovah's Witness, and Witnesses do not participate in politics. In the past, Janet Jackson has said that her religious upbringing was very important to her, but that she did not identify as a Witness.)

But politics aside, Janet Jackson's comments disparaging Harris' race shed light on how isolated celebrities are from the rest of us. There's no reason to doubt Jackson's past social commitments, but it does lead one to wonder how deeply those commitments are felt when the same person unwittingly plays into what Harris aptly called “the same old, hackneyed script” about blacks in leadership positions. It's troubling when blacks seem to be flipping through the same book for information about each other. While there are some black Trump supporters, it's hard to imagine Jackson among them, given their past social positions.

As we know very well from her late brother Michael, celebrity life can be deeply isolating. It is not unlike social alienation in that it can lead to distance and distrust among celebrities.

Instead, she seems to have fallen down the kind of internet rabbit hole that makes wild conspiracies seem plausible. In fact, during the Guardian interview, Jackson said she was told the information she revealed about Harris and “they found out” that Harris' father was white. As we know very well from her late brother Michael, life as a celebrity can be deeply isolating. It's not unlike social alienation in that it can cause celebrities to become disconnected from social institutions like the government and the media and worryingly distrustful.

Celebrities like Jackson are among the super-rich whose lives bear no resemblance to our own. Yet we are eager to know what they think about political and social issues, and sometimes assume that they can change people's hearts and minds in ways we cannot. Such endorsements can have a mobilizing effect on followers, even if the long-term effects are unclear.

When Taylor Swift endorsed Harris immediately after her Sept. 10 debate against Trump, many breathed a sigh of relief. Swift has a huge fan base, especially among white women, who Democrats hope will show up in large numbers in November. Seen as particularly thoughtful and influential, Swift's well-timed endorsement was liked by millions within minutes, prompting Trump to post on Truth Social, “I HATE TAYLOR SWIFT!” From Susan Sarandon to Harry Belafonte, entertainers have long used their celebrity status to advocate for the causes they believe in, sometimes jeopardizing their careers in the process.

But Jackson wasn't so much commenting as stumbling through a bizarre answer to a simple question. If we're to learn anything from this rambling, it's a reminder that while celebrities may seem larger than life, they're vulnerable to misinformation like we are, perhaps even more so.